7SJQ | pdb_00007sjq

Ex silico engineering of cystine-dense peptides yielding a potent bispecific T-cell engager


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.232 (Depositor), 0.236 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.191 (Depositor), 0.199 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.193 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 7SJQ

Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history

Literature

Ex silico engineering of cystine-dense peptides yielding a potent bispecific T cell engager.

Crook, Z.R.Girard, E.J.Sevilla, G.P.Brusniak, M.Y.Rupert, P.B.Friend, D.J.Gewe, M.M.Clarke, M.Lin, I.Ruff, R.Pakiam, F.Phi, T.D.Bandaranayake, A.Correnti, C.E.Mhyre, A.J.Nairn, N.W.Strong, R.K.Olson, J.M.

(2022) Sci Transl Med 14: eabn0402-eabn0402

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abn0402
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    7SAO, 7SAP, 7SGQ, 7SJQ, 7SLT, 7SNC, 7SND

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Cystine-dense peptides (CDPs) are a miniprotein class that can drug difficult targets with high affinity and low immunogenicity. Tools for their design, however, are not as developed as those for small-molecule and antibody drugs. CDPs have diverse taxonomic origins, but structural characterization is lacking. Here, we adapted Iterative Threading ASSEmbly Refinement (I-TASSER) and Rosetta protein modeling software for structural prediction of 4298 CDP scaffolds and performed in silico prescreening for CDP binders to targets of interest. Mammalian display screening of a library of docking-enriched, methionine and tyrosine scanned (DEMYS) CDPs against PD-L1 yielded binders from four distinct CDP scaffolds. One was affinity-matured, and cocrystallography yielded a high-affinity ( K D = 202 pM) PD-L1-binding CDP that competes with PD-1 for PD-L1 binding. Its subsequent incorporation into a CD3-binding bispecific T cell engager produced a molecule with pM-range in vitro T cell killing potency and which substantially extends survival in two different xenograft tumor-bearing mouse models. Both in vitro and in vivo, the CDP-incorporating bispecific molecule outperformed a comparator antibody-based molecule. This CDP modeling and DEMYS technique can accelerate CDP therapeutic development.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 19.64 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 1,289 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 150 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 170 
  • Unique protein chains: 2

Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1119Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: CD274B7H1PDCD1L1PDCD1LG1PDL1
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for Q9NZQ7 (Homo sapiens)
Explore Q9NZQ7 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q9NZQ7
PHAROS:  Q9NZQ7
GTEx:  ENSG00000120217 
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ9NZQ7
Glycosylation
Glycosylation Sites: 1Go to GlyGen: Q9NZQ7-1
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Cystine-dense peptideB [auth D]51synthetic constructMutation(s): 0 

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.232 (Depositor), 0.236 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.191 (Depositor), 0.199 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.193 (Depositor) 
Space Group: C 2 2 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 56.04α = 90
b = 65.33β = 90
c = 99.912γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
CrysalisProdata reduction
Aimlessdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

& Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
Other private--

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2022-06-08
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2023-10-18
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description
  • Version 1.2: 2024-11-20
    Changes: Structure summary