7LOD

T4 lysozyme mutant L99A in complex with 1-fluoranyl-4-iodanyl-benzene


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.02 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.213 
  • R-Value Work: 0.212 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.212 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Energy penalties enhance flexible receptor docking in a model cavity.

Kamenik, A.S.Singh, I.Lak, P.Balius, T.E.Liedl, K.R.Shoichet, B.K.

(2021) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106195118
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    7LOA, 7LOB, 7LOC, 7LOD, 7LOE, 7LOF, 7LOG, 7LOJ, 7LX6, 7LX7, 7LX8, 7LX9, 7LXA

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Protein flexibility remains a major challenge in library docking because of difficulties in sampling conformational ensembles with accurate probabilities. Here, we use the model cavity site of T4 lysozyme L99A to test flexible receptor docking with energy penalties from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Crystallography with larger and smaller ligands indicates that this cavity can adopt three major conformations: open, intermediate, and closed. Since smaller ligands typically bind better to the cavity site, we anticipate an energy penalty for the cavity opening. To estimate its magnitude, we calculate conformational preferences from MD simulations. We find that including a penalty term is essential for retrospective ligand enrichment; otherwise, high-energy states dominate the docking. We then prospectively docked a library of over 900,000 compounds for new molecules binding to each conformational state. Absent a penalty term, the open conformation dominated the docking results; inclusion of this term led to a balanced sampling of ligands against each state. High ranked molecules were experimentally tested by T m upshift and X-ray crystallography. From 33 selected molecules, we identified 18 ligands and determined 13 crystal structures. Most interesting were those bound to the open cavity, where the buried site opens to bulk solvent. Here, highly unusual ligands for this cavity had been predicted, including large ligands with polar tails; these were confirmed both by binding and by crystallography. In docking, incorporating protein flexibility with thermodynamic weightings may thus access new ligand chemotypes. The MD approach to accessing and, crucially, weighting such alternative states may find general applicability.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Institute of General, Inorganic, and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Lysozyme172Tequatrovirus T4Mutation(s): 1 
Gene Names: eT4Tp126
EC: 3.2.1.17
UniProt
Find proteins for P00720 (Enterobacteria phage T4)
Explore P00720 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00720
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00720
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.02 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.213 
  • R-Value Work: 0.212 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.212 
  • Space Group: P 32 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 60.209α = 90
b = 60.209β = 90
c = 96.185γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
XDSdata reduction
Aimlessdata scaling
MOLREPphasing
PHENIXrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)United States--

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2021-05-19
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2021-12-08
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2023-10-18
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description