6I6S

Circular permutant of ribosomal protein S6, adding 9aa to C terminal of P68-69, L75A mutant


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.46 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.196 
  • R-Value Work: 0.166 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.167 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 2.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Exposing the distinctive modular behavior of beta-strands and alpha-helices in folded proteins.

Wang, H.Logan, D.T.Danielsson, J.Oliveberg, M.

(2020) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117: 28775-28783

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920455117
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    6I69, 6I6E, 6I6I, 6I6O, 6I6S, 6I6U, 6I6W, 6I6Y

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Although folded proteins are commonly depicted as simplistic combinations of β-strands and α-helices, the actual properties and functions of these secondary-structure elements in their native contexts are just partly understood. The principal reason is that the behavior of individual β- and α-elements is obscured by the global folding cooperativity. In this study, we have circumvented this problem by designing frustrated variants of the mixed α/β-protein S6, which allow the structural behavior of individual β-strands and α-helices to be targeted selectively by stopped-flow kinetics, X-ray crystallography, and solution-state NMR. Essentially, our approach is based on provoking intramolecular "domain swap." The results show that the α- and β-elements have quite different characteristics: The swaps of β-strands proceed via global unfolding, whereas the α-helices are free to swap locally in the native basin. Moreover, the α-helices tend to hybridize and to promote protein association by gliding over to neighboring molecules. This difference in structural behavior follows directly from hydrogen-bonding restrictions and suggests that the protein secondary structure defines not only tertiary geometry, but also maintains control in function and structural evolution. Finally, our alternative approach to protein folding and native-state dynamics presents a generally applicable strategy for in silico design of protein models that are computationally testable in the microsecond-millisecond regime.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Arrhenius Laboratories of Natural Sciences, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
30S ribosomal protein S6,30S ribosomal protein S6,30S ribosomal protein S6,30S ribosomal protein S6,30S ribosomal protein S6,30S ribosomal protein S6,30S ribosomal protein S6,30S ribosomal protein S6
A, B
105Thermus thermophilus HB8Mutation(s): 1 
Gene Names: rpsFTTHA0245
UniProt
Find proteins for Q5SLP8 (Thermus thermophilus (strain ATCC 27634 / DSM 579 / HB8))
Explore Q5SLP8 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q5SLP8
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ5SLP8
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.46 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.196 
  • R-Value Work: 0.166 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.167 
  • Space Group: C 2 2 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 48.73α = 90
b = 52.9β = 90
c = 133.06γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
Aimlessdata scaling
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
XDSdata reduction
MOLREPphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2019-11-27
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 2.0: 2020-01-15
    Type: Coordinate replacement
    Reason: Polymer geometry
    Changes: Advisory, Atomic model, Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Non-polymer description, Polymer sequence, Refinement description, Source and taxonomy, Structure summary
  • Version 2.1: 2020-12-09
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations
  • Version 2.2: 2024-01-24
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Refinement description