5TJ3

Crystal structure of wild type alkaline phosphatase PafA to 1.7A resolution


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.70 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.177 
  • R-Value Work: 0.158 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.160 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Mechanistic and Evolutionary Insights from Comparative Enzymology of Phosphomonoesterases and Phosphodiesterases across the Alkaline Phosphatase Superfamily.

Sunden, F.AlSadhan, I.Lyubimov, A.Y.Ressl, S.Wiersma-Koch, H.Borland, J.Brown, C.L.Johnson, T.A.Singh, Z.Herschlag, D.

(2016) J Am Chem Soc 138: 14273-14287

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b06186
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    5TJ3

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Naively one might have expected an early division between phosphate monoesterases and diesterases of the alkaline phosphatase (AP) superfamily. On the contrary, prior results and our structural and biochemical analyses of phosphate monoesterase PafA, from Chryseobacterium meningosepticum, indicate similarities to a superfamily phosphate diesterase [Xanthomonas citri nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (NPP)] and distinct differences from the three metal ion AP superfamily monoesterase, from Escherichia coli AP (EcAP). We carried out a series of experiments to map out and learn from the differences and similarities between these enzymes. First, we asked why there would be independent instances of monoesterases in the AP superfamily? PafA has a much weaker product inhibition and slightly higher activity relative to EcAP, suggesting that different metabolic evolutionary pressures favored distinct active-site architectures. Next, we addressed the preferential phosphate monoester and diester catalysis of PafA and NPP, respectively. We asked whether the >80% sequence differences throughout these scaffolds provide functional specialization for each enzyme's cognate reaction. In contrast to expectations from this model, PafA and NPP mutants with the common subset of active-site groups embedded in each native scaffold had the same monoesterase:diesterase specificities; thus, the >10 7 -fold difference in native specificities appears to arise from distinct interactions at a single phosphoryl substituent. We also uncovered striking mechanistic similarities between the PafA and EcAP monoesterases, including evidence for ground-state destabilization and functional active-site networks that involve different active-site groups but may play analogous catalytic roles. Discovering common network functions may reveal active-site architectural connections that are critical for function, and identifying regions of functional modularity may facilitate the design of new enzymes from existing promiscuous templates. More generally, comparative enzymology and analysis of catalytic promiscuity can provide mechanistic and evolutionary insights.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry, Beckman Center, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Alkaline phosphatase PafA549Elizabethkingia meningosepticaMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: pafA
EC: 3.1.3.1
UniProt
Find proteins for Q9KJX5 (Elizabethkingia meningoseptica)
Explore Q9KJX5 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q9KJX5
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ9KJX5
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.70 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.177 
  • R-Value Work: 0.158 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.160 
  • Space Group: I 4
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 113.797α = 90
b = 113.797β = 90
c = 71.442γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
Blu-Icedata collection
Aimlessdata scaling
PHASERphasing
PHENIXrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
iMOSFLMdata reduction
Cootmodel building

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)United StatesGM49243

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2016-11-16
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2017-09-13
    Changes: Author supporting evidence, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.2: 2019-12-25
    Changes: Author supporting evidence
  • Version 1.3: 2023-10-04
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description
  • Version 1.4: 2024-11-06
    Changes: Structure summary