5F6M | pdb_00005f6m

Isotropic Trypsin Model for Comparison of Diffuse Scattering


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.10 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.154 (Depositor), 0.164 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.145 (Depositor) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.145 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 5F6M

This is version 1.5 of the entry. See complete history

Literature

Measuring and modeling diffuse scattering in protein X-ray crystallography.

Van Benschoten, A.H.Liu, L.Gonzalez, A.Brewster, A.S.Sauter, N.K.Fraser, J.S.Wall, M.E.

(2016) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113: 4069-4074

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524048113
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    5F66, 5F6M

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    X-ray diffraction has the potential to provide rich information about the structural dynamics of macromolecules. To realize this potential, both Bragg scattering, which is currently used to derive macromolecular structures, and diffuse scattering, which reports on correlations in charge density variations, must be measured. Until now, measurement of diffuse scattering from protein crystals has been scarce because of the extra effort of collecting diffuse data. Here, we present 3D measurements of diffuse intensity collected from crystals of the enzymes cyclophilin A and trypsin. The measurements were obtained from the same X-ray diffraction images as the Bragg data, using best practices for standard data collection. To model the underlying dynamics in a practical way that could be used during structure refinement, we tested translation-libration-screw (TLS), liquid-like motions (LLM), and coarse-grained normal-modes (NM) models of protein motions. The LLM model provides a global picture of motions and was refined against the diffuse data, whereas the TLS and NM models provide more detailed and distinct descriptions of atom displacements, and only used information from the Bragg data. Whereas different TLS groupings yielded similar Bragg intensities, they yielded different diffuse intensities, none of which agreed well with the data. In contrast, both the LLM and NM models agreed substantially with the diffuse data. These results demonstrate a realistic path to increase the number of diffuse datasets available to the wider biosciences community and indicate that dynamics-inspired NM structural models can simultaneously agree with both Bragg and diffuse scattering.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158;

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 23.58 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 2,184 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 223 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 223 
  • Unique protein chains: 1

Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Cationic trypsin223Bos taurusMutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.4.21.4
UniProt
Find proteins for P00760 (Bos taurus)
Explore P00760 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00760
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00760
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.10 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.154 (Depositor), 0.164 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.145 (Depositor) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.145 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 21 21 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 54.81α = 90
b = 58.51β = 90
c = 67.42γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
XDSdata reduction
XSCALEdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2016-01-06
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2016-03-30
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2016-04-13
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2016-06-22
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.4: 2023-09-27
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description
  • Version 1.5: 2024-11-13
    Changes: Structure summary