3TGP | pdb_00003tgp

Room temperature H-ras


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.31 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.213 (Depositor), 0.212 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.166 (Depositor), 0.165 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.169 (Depositor) 

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 3TGP

Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history

Literature

Accessing protein conformational ensembles using room-temperature X-ray crystallography.

Fraser, J.S.van den Bedem, H.Samelson, A.J.Lang, P.T.Holton, J.M.Echols, N.Alber, T.

(2011) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 16247-16252

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111325108
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    3TGP

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Modern protein crystal structures are based nearly exclusively on X-ray data collected at cryogenic temperatures (generally 100 K). The cooling process is thought to introduce little bias in the functional interpretation of structural results, because cryogenic temperatures minimally perturb the overall protein backbone fold. In contrast, here we show that flash cooling biases previously hidden structural ensembles in protein crystals. By analyzing available data for 30 different proteins using new computational tools for electron-density sampling, model refinement, and molecular packing analysis, we found that crystal cryocooling remodels the conformational distributions of more than 35% of side chains and eliminates packing defects necessary for functional motions. In the signaling switch protein, H-Ras, an allosteric network consistent with fluctuations detected in solution by NMR was uncovered in the room-temperature, but not the cryogenic, electron-density maps. These results expose a bias in structural databases toward smaller, overpacked, and unrealistically unique models. Monitoring room-temperature conformational ensembles by X-ray crystallography can reveal motions crucial for catalysis, ligand binding, and allosteric regulation.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3220, USA.

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 19.42 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 2,888 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 166 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 166 
  • Unique protein chains: 1

Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
GTPase HRas166Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: HRASHRAS1
EC: 3.6.5.2
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for P01112 (Homo sapiens)
Explore P01112 
Go to UniProtKB:  P01112
PHAROS:  P01112
GTEx:  ENSG00000174775 
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP01112
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence

Small Molecules

Ligands 2 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
GNP

Query on GNP



Download:Ideal Coordinates CCD File
B [auth A]PHOSPHOAMINOPHOSPHONIC ACID-GUANYLATE ESTER
C10 H17 N6 O13 P3
UQABYHGXWYXDTK-UUOKFMHZSA-N
MG

Query on MG



Download:Ideal Coordinates CCD File
C [auth A]MAGNESIUM ION
Mg
JLVVSXFLKOJNIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.31 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.213 (Depositor), 0.212 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.166 (Depositor), 0.165 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.169 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 32 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 40.1α = 90
b = 40.1β = 90
c = 160.6γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2011-10-12
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2018-01-24
    Changes: Structure summary
  • Version 1.2: 2024-02-28
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations