Skip to main content

 33AW | pdb_000033aw

T33-Fus-2 asymmetric unit - Designed tetrahedral protein cage based on helical fusion and machine learning


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
  • Resolution: 3.84 Å
  • Aggregation State: PARTICLE 
  • Reconstruction Method: SINGLE PARTICLE 

Starting Model: in silico
View more details

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 33AW

This is version 1.1 of the entry. See complete history. 

Literature

Design and Structure of Protein Cages Based on Helical Fusion and Machine Learning.

San Segundo-Acosta, P., Le Coq, J., Boskovic, J., Aglietti, R.A., Bowers, P., Yeates, T.O., Castells-Graells, R.

(2026) J Am Chem Soc 148: 44372-44379

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6c11491
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    33AR, 33AS, 33AT, 33AU, 33AV, 33AW

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Self-assembling protein cages are versatile nanoscale architectures with broad applications in drug delivery, vaccine development, and structural biology. Historically, two main strategies have been used to construct such cages: genetic fusion of oligomeric domains connected by helical linkers, and computational interface design using either physics-based or machine learning-based methods. Here, we extend the original fusion approach using modern AI algorithms and more sophisticated treatments of helix bending to create protein cages with novel architectures composed exclusively of trimeric building blocks arranged in tetrahedral symmetry. Of 15 designs tested experimentally, multiple sequence variants of two of these designs assembled predominantly into soluble, monodisperse particles of the expected size, with native molecular masses of 633 kDa (T33-Fus-1A, B) and 638 kDa (T33-Fus-2). Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of three distinct sequence variants spanning from 3.0 to 3.9 Å in resolution confirmed the intended structures in atomic detail, with C-α RMSD values over the entire assemblies as low as 2 Å. The predicted modes of helix bending were similarly validated. The results highlight the impact of methodological improvements for achieving a level of regularity and design precision that has largely evaded prior applications of the fusion approach. These findings expand the prospects and accessible design space for self-assembling protein nanomaterials.


  • Organizational Affiliation: 
    • Structural Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid28029, Spain.

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 53.24 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 3,589 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 465 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 482 
  • Unique protein chains: 1

Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
T33-Fus-2-subunit482synthetic constructMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
  • Resolution: 3.84 Å
  • Aggregation State: PARTICLE 
  • Reconstruction Method: SINGLE PARTICLE 
EM Software:
TaskSoftware PackageVersion
MODEL REFINEMENTPHENIX1.21.2_5419
RECONSTRUCTIONcryoSPARCv5.0.4

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

& Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI)SpainPID2024-161096NA-I00
European Union (EU)European UnionC005/24-ED CV1
Generalitat de CatalunyaSpainIU16-014045

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2026-09-30
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2026-11-04
    Changes: Data collection, Database references