2Q3R | pdb_00002q3r

Ensemble refinement of the protein crystal structure of At1g76680 from Arabidopsis thaliana


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.282 (Depositor), 0.293 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.195 (Depositor), 0.209 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.195 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 2Q3R

Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history

Re-refinement Note

This entry reflects an alternative modeling of the original data in: 1VJI

Literature

Ensemble refinement of protein crystal structures: validation and application.

Levin, E.J.Kondrashov, D.A.Wesenberg, G.E.Phillips, G.N.

(2007) Structure 15: 1040-1052

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2007.06.019
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    2Q3M, 2Q3O, 2Q3P, 2Q3Q, 2Q3R, 2Q3S, 2Q3T, 2Q3U, 2Q3V, 2Q3W, 2Q40, 2Q41, 2Q42, 2Q43, 2Q44, 2Q45, 2Q46, 2Q47, 2Q48, 2Q49, 2Q4A, 2Q4B, 2Q4C, 2Q4D, 2Q4E, 2Q4F, 2Q4H, 2Q4I, 2Q4J, 2Q4K, 2Q4L, 2Q4M, 2Q4N, 2Q4O, 2Q4P, 2Q4Q, 2Q4R, 2Q4S, 2Q4T, 2Q4U, 2Q4V, 2Q4X, 2Q4Y, 2Q4Z, 2Q50, 2Q51, 2Q52

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    X-ray crystallography typically uses a single set of coordinates and B factors to describe macromolecular conformations. Refinement of multiple copies of the entire structure has been previously used in specific cases as an alternative means of representing structural flexibility. Here, we systematically validate this method by using simulated diffraction data, and we find that ensemble refinement produces better representations of the distributions of atomic positions in the simulated structures than single-conformer refinements. Comparison of principal components calculated from the refined ensembles and simulations shows that concerted motions are captured locally, but that correlations dissipate over long distances. Ensemble refinement is also used on 50 experimental structures of varying resolution and leads to decreases in R(free) values, implying that improvements in the representation of flexibility observed for the simulated structures may apply to real structures. These gains are essentially independent of resolution or data-to-parameter ratio, suggesting that even structures at moderate resolution can benefit from ensemble refinement.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 41.67 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 2,886 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 351 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 372 
  • Unique protein chains: 1

Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
12-oxophytodienoate reductase 1372Arabidopsis thalianaMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: OPR1At1g76680F28O16.5
EC: 1.3.1.42
UniProt
Find proteins for Q8LAH7 (Arabidopsis thaliana)
Explore Q8LAH7 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q8LAH7
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ8LAH7
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence

Small Molecules

Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
FMN

Query on FMN



Download:Ideal Coordinates CCD File
B [auth A]FLAVIN MONONUCLEOTIDE
C17 H21 N4 O9 P
FVTCRASFADXXNN-SCRDCRAPSA-N

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.282 (Depositor), 0.293 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.195 (Depositor), 0.209 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.195 (Depositor) 
Space Group: C 2 2 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 46.688α = 90
b = 88.066β = 90
c = 149.334γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
CNSrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
CNSphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2007-06-19
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2007-09-25
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2011-08-10
    Changes: Other
  • Version 1.4: 2023-08-30
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description