☰ Navigation Tabs
Solution structure of the major MYC promoter G-quadruplex with a wild-type flanking in complex with NSC85697, a quinoline derivative
NMR Experiment Experiment Type Sample Contents Solvent Ionic Strength pH Pressure Temperature (K) Spectrometer 1 2D NOESY 0.8 mM Myc2345, 2.4 mM NSC85697, 10 mM potassium phosphate 90% H2O/10% D2O 10 mM 7 1 atm 298 Bruker AVANCE III 800 2 2D NOESY 0.8 mM Myc2345, 2.4 mM NSC85697, 10 mM potassium phosphate 90% H2O/10% D2O 10 mM 7 1 atm 288 Bruker AVANCE III 800 3 2D NOESY 0.8 mM Myc2345, 2.4 mM NSC85697, 10 mM potassium phosphate 90% H2O/10% D2O 10 mM 7 1 atm 308 Bruker AVANCE III 800 4 2D DQF-COSY 0.8 mM Myc2345, 2.4 mM NSC85697, 10 mM potassium phosphate 90% H2O/10% D2O 10 mM 7 1 atm 308 Bruker AVANCE III 800 5 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 0.8 mM Myc2345, 2.4 mM NSC85697, 10 mM potassium phosphate 90% H2O/10% D2O 10 mM 7 1 atm 298 Bruker AVANCE III 800
NMR Spectrometer Information Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength 1 Bruker AVANCE III 800
NMR Refinement Method Details Software simulated annealing X-PLOR NIH simulated annealing Amber molecular dynamics Amber
NMR Ensemble Information Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy Conformers Calculated Total Number 20 Conformers Submitted Total Number 10 Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software # Classification Version Software Name Author 1 refinement Amber 16 Case, Darden, Cheatham III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, and Kollman 2 structure calculation X-PLOR NIH 2.48 Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore 5 structure calculation Amber 16 Case, Darden, Cheatham III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, and Kollman 3 chemical shift assignment CcpNmr Analysis CCPN 4 peak picking CcpNmr Analysis CCPN