SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-1H TOCSY1 mM synoeca, 100 mM [U-98% 2H] SDS-D25, 5 % v/v [U-98% 2H] DSS, 90 % v/v H2O, 10 % [U-99% 2H] D2O90% H2O/10% D2Oneutal71 atm298Bruker AVANCE 500
22D 1H-1H NOESY1 mM synoeca, 100 mM [U-98% 2H] SDS-D25, 5 % v/v [U-98% 2H] DSS, 90 % v/v H2O, 10 % [U-99% 2H] D2O90% H2O/10% D2Oneutal71 atm298Bruker AVANCE 500
32D 1H-13C HSQC1 mM synoeca, 100 mM [U-98% 2H] SDS-D25, 5 % v/v [U-98% 2H] DSS, 90 % v/v H2O, 10 % [U-99% 2H] D2O90% H2O/10% D2Oneutal71 atm298Bruker AVANCE 500
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE500
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingIn the final structure calculation of synoeca-MP, 176 unique NOEs and 24 dihedral angles were used as restraintsX-PLOR NIH
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number200
Conformers Submitted Total Number10
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1chemical shift assignmentNMRViewJohnson, One Moon Scientific
2structure calculationX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
3processingNMRPipeDelaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
4refinementX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
5geometry optimizationTALOSCornilescu, Delaglio and Bax