5NL2

cryo-EM structure of the mTMEM16A ion channel at 6.6 A resolution.


ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

Starting Model(s)

Initial Refinement Model(s)
TypeSourceAccession CodeDetails
experimental modelPDB 4WIT 

Refinement

RMS Deviations
KeyRefinement Restraint Deviation
f_dihedral_angle_d4.269
f_angle_d0.632
f_chiral_restr0.042
f_plane_restr0.005
f_bond_d0.004
Sample
mTMEM16A
Specimen Preparation
Sample Aggregation StatePARTICLE
Vitrification InstrumentFEI VITROBOT MARK IV
Cryogen NameETHANE
Sample Vitrification Details2.5 ul sample volume 1-5 sec blotting time
3D Reconstruction
Reconstruction MethodSINGLE PARTICLE
Number of Particles213243
Reported Resolution (Å)6.6
Resolution MethodFSC 0.143 CUT-OFF
Other Details
Refinement Type
Symmetry TypePOINT
Point SymmetryC2
Map-Model Fitting and Refinement
Id1 (4WIT)
Refinement Space
Refinement ProtocolRIGID BODY FIT
Refinement Target
Overall B Value
Fitting Procedure
Details
Data Acquisition
Detector TypeGATAN K2 SUMMIT (4k x 4k)
Electron Dose (electrons/Å**2)80
Imaging Experiment1
Date of Experiment
Temperature (Kelvin)
Microscope ModelFEI TITAN KRIOS
Minimum Defocus (nm)500
Maximum Defocus (nm)3800
Minimum Tilt Angle (degrees)
Maximum Tilt Angle (degrees)
Nominal CS2.7
Imaging ModeBRIGHT FIELD
Specimen Holder ModelFEI TITAN KRIOS AUTOGRID HOLDER
Nominal Magnification37037
Calibrated Magnification37037
SourceFIELD EMISSION GUN
Acceleration Voltage (kV)300
Imaging Details
EM Software
TaskSoftware PackageVersion
PARTICLE SELECTIONRELION2
IMAGE ACQUISITIONSerialEM
CTF CORRECTIONCTFFIND4.1.5
MODEL FITTINGCoot
MODEL REFINEMENTPHENIX
INITIAL EULER ASSIGNMENTRELION2
FINAL EULER ASSIGNMENTRELION2
CLASSIFICATIONRELION2
RECONSTRUCTIONRELION2
Image Processing
CTF Correction TypeCTF Correction DetailsNumber of Particles SelectedParticle Selection Details
PHASE FLIPPING AND AMPLITUDE CORRECTIONThe contrast transfer function (CTF) parameters were estimated on the movie frames by ctffind4.1755348Images showing a strong drift, higher defocus than -3.8 um or a bad CTF estimation were discarded, resulting in 4,178 images used for further analysis. Image processing was performed using the software package RELION1.4 and at a later stage RELION2.0. Approximately 4,000 particles were manually picked to generate templates for automated particle selection. Following automated picking in RELION, false positives were eliminated manually or through a first round of 2D classification resulting in 755,348 particles.