Experiment: 2PJF

Solution structure of rhodostomin

SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment	Type	Sample Contents	Solvent	Ionic Strength	pH	Pressure	Temperature (K)	Spectrometer
1	2D NOESY	2mM Rhodostomin, 90%H2O, 10%D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O		6.0	ambient	300
2	2D TOCSY	2mM Rhodostomin, 90%H2O, 10%D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O		6.0	ambient	300
3	2D NOESY	2mM Rhodostomin, 100%D2O	100% D2O		6.0	ambient	300
4	2D TOCSY	2mM Rhodostomin, 100%D2O	100% D2O		6.0	ambient	300
5	3D_15N-separated_NOESY	2mM Rhodostomin U-15N, 90%H2O, 10%D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O		6.0	ambient	300
6	3D_15N-separated_TOCSY	2mM Rhodostomin U-15N, 90%H2O, 10%D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O		6.0	ambient	300
7	HNHA	2mM Rhodostomin U-15N, 90%H2O, 10%D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O		6.0	ambient	300
8	2D HSQC	2mM Rhodostomin U-15N, 100%D2O	100% D2O		6.0	ambient	300

NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer	Manufacturer	Model	Field Strength
1	Bruker	AVANCE	600

NMR Refinement
Method	Details	Software
distance geometry, simulated annealing	the structures are based on a total of 1014 restraints, 944 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 55 dihedral angle restraints, 9 distance restraints from hydrogen bonds, 6 distance restraints from disulfide bonds	XwinNMR

NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria	structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number	200
Conformers Submitted Total Number	20
Representative Model	1 (closest to the average)

Additional NMR Experimental Information
Details	This structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques.

Computation: NMR Software
#	Classification	Version	Software Name	Author
1	collection	XwinNMR	2.6	Bruker
2	data analysis	AURELIA	3.1.7	Bruker
3	refinement	X-PLOR	3.185	Brunger