2MTL
Solution NMR Structure of De novo designed FR55, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) Target OR109
SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
1 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 | ||
2 | 2D 1H-13C HSQC | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 | ||
3 | 3D HNCO | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 | ||
4 | 3D CBCA(CO)NH | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 | ||
5 | 3D HNCACB | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 | ||
6 | 3D 1H-13C arom NOESY | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 | ||
7 | 3D simutaneous 13C-aromatic,13C-aliphatic,15N edited 1H-1H NOESY | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 | ||
8 | 3D CCH-TOCSY | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 | ||
9 | 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 | ||
10 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 1.01 mM OR109.009 | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 4.5 | ambient | 308 |
NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
1 | Bruker | AVANCE | 800 |
2 | Varian | INOVA | 600 |
3 | Varian | INOVA | 600 |
NMR Refinement | ||
---|---|---|
Method | Details | Software |
distance geometry, simulated annealing, molecular dynamics | CNS |
NMR Ensemble Information | |
---|---|
Conformer Selection Criteria | target function |
Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
Representative Model | 1 (lowest energy) |
Computation: NMR Software | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
1 | refinement | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
2 | structure solution | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
3 | geometry optimization | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
4 | refinement | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
5 | geometry optimization | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
6 | structure solution | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
7 | data analysis | AutoStructure | 2.1 | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione |
8 | refinement | AutoStructure | 2.1 | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione |
9 | data analysis | AutoAssign | 2.1 | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |
10 | chemical shift assignment | AutoAssign | 2.1 | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |
11 | processing | NMRPipe | Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax | |
12 | data analysis | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
13 | chemical shift assignment | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
14 | peak picking | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
15 | collection | TopSpin | Bruker Biospin | |
16 | collection | VnmrJ | Varian | |
17 | data analysis | Sparky | Goddard | |
18 | geometry optimization | TALOS+ | Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax | |
19 | geometry optimization | REDCAT | Valafar, Prestegard | |
20 | structure validation | PSVS | Bhattacharya, Montelione |