☰ Navigation Tabs
Identification of the key regions that drive functional amyloid formation by the fungal hydrophobin EAS
NMR Experiment Experiment Type Sample Contents Solvent Ionic Strength pH Pressure Temperature (K) Spectrometer 1 2D DQF-COSY 5 % D2O-1, 95 % H2O-2, 20-34 uM DSS-3, 20 mM sodium phosphate-4, 890 uM entity-5 95% H2O/5% D2O 20 7 ambient 298 2 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 5 % D2O-1, 95 % H2O-2, 20-34 uM DSS-3, 20 mM sodium phosphate-4, 890 uM entity-5 95% H2O/5% D2O 20 7 ambient 298 3 2D 1H-1H NOESY 5 % D2O-1, 95 % H2O-2, 20-34 uM DSS-3, 20 mM sodium phosphate-4, 890 uM entity-5 95% H2O/5% D2O 20 7 ambient 298 4 2D 1H-15N HSQC 5 % D2O-6, 95 % H2O-7, 20-34 uM DSS-8, 20 mM sodium phosphate-9, 280 uM [U-98% 15N] entity-10 95% H2O/5% D2O 20 6 ambient 298 5 3D HNHA 5 % D2O-6, 95 % H2O-7, 20-34 uM DSS-8, 20 mM sodium phosphate-9, 280 uM [U-98% 15N] entity-10 95% H2O/5% D2O 20 6 ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength 1 Bruker AVANCE 600
NMR Refinement Method Details Software simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, torsion angle dynamics TopSpin
NMR Ensemble Information Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy Conformers Calculated Total Number 1000 Conformers Submitted Total Number 20 Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software # Classification Version Software Name Author 1 collection TopSpin v1.3 Bruker Biospin 2 processing TopSpin v1.3 Bruker Biospin 3 chemical shift assignment Sparky Goddard 4 peak picking Sparky Goddard 5 data analysis Sparky Goddard 6 refinement ARIA v1.2 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges 7 structure solution ARIA v1.2 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges 8 structure solution CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read 9 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read 10 structure validation ProcheckNMR Laskowski and MacArthur 11 data analysis MOLMOL Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich