Experiment: 2L47

Solution structure of the PlyG catalytic domain

SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment	Type	Sample Contents	Solvent	Ionic Strength	pH	Pressure	Temperature (K)	Spectrometer
1	3D_15N-separated_NOESY	1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] PlyG, 10 mM [U-99% 2H] Bis-Tris, 90% H2O, 10% D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O	13	6.0	AMBIENT	303
2	3D_13C-separated_NOESY	1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] PlyG, 10 mM [U-99% 2H] Bis-Tris, 90% H2O, 10% D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O	13	6.0	AMBIENT	303
3	3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC)	1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] PlyG, 10 mM [U-99% 2H] Bis-Tris, 90% H2O, 10% D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O	13	6.0	AMBIENT	303
4		1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] PlyG, 10 mM [U-99% 2H] Bis-Tris, 90% H2O, 10% D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O	13	6.0	AMBIENT	303

NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer	Manufacturer	Model	Field Strength
1	Bruker	DRX	600

NMR Refinement
Method	Details	Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT	STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 3503 NOE CONSTRAINTS (634 INTRA, 594 SEQUENTIAL, 750 MEDIUM and 1525 LONG RANGE CONSTRAINTS) AND 216 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS.	Xplor-NIH

NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria	target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number	100
Conformers Submitted Total Number	20
Representative Model	1 (lowest energy)

Computation: NMR Software
#	Classification	Version	Software Name	Author
1	refinement	Xplor-NIH	2.9.3	SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2	collection	TopSpin	2.1	Bruker
3	processing	NMRPipe	2007	Delagio,F. et al.
4	data analysis	XEASY	1.3	Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5	data analysis	GARANT	2.1	C. Bartels
6	structural calculation	CYANA	2.1	Guntert, P.