2KUZ

2-Aminopurine incorporation perturbs the dynamics and structure of DNA


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-13C HMQC3 mM DNAstrandI, 3 mM DNAstrandII, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride100% D2O7.0ambient298
22D 1H-13C HMQC3 mM DNAstrandI, 3 mM DNAstrandII, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 20 mg/mL Pf1 phage90% H2O/10% D2O7.0ambient298
32D 1H-1H NOESY3 mM DNAstrandI, 3 mM DNAstrandII, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride100% D2O7.0ambient298
42D 1H-1H TOCSY3 mM DNAstrandI, 3 mM DNAstrandII, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride100% D2O7.0ambient298
52D DQF-COSY3 mM DNAstrandI, 3 mM DNAstrandII, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride100% D2O7.0ambient298
62D 1H-1H NOESY3 mM DNAstrandI, 3 mM DNAstrandII, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride90% H2O/10% D2O7.0ambient298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingTorsion angle dynamics, 50K at 20,000K with subsequent gradual cooling to 25K in 154 steps of 0.5 ps length (34 steps to cool down to 3,000 K, followed by 120 steps to reach the end temperature) and a final minimization (3,000 steps).CARA
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number11
Representative Model1 (minimized average structure)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1peak pickingCARA1.8.4Keller, R. et al.
2chemical shift assignmentCARA1.8.4Keller, R. et al.
3structure solutionX-PLOR NIH2.20Schwieters, C. et al.
4refinementX-PLOR NIH2.20Schwieters, C. et al.
5geometry optimizationX-PLOR NIH2.20Schwieters, C. et al.
6collectionTopSpin2.0Bruker Biospin
7processingTopSpin2.0Bruker Biospin
8data analysisGifa4Delsuc, M.A. et al.
9data analysis3DNALu, X.J. et al.
10data analysisPALESZweckstetter, M. et al.