2KPO
Solution NMR structure of de novo designed rossmann 2x2 fold protein, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium target OR16
SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
1 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 0.859 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 200 | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | |
2 | 2D 1H-13C HSQC | 0.867 mM [U-10% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 200 | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | |
3 | 3D CBCA(CO)NH | 0.859 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 200 | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | |
4 | 3D HNCACB | 0.859 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 200 | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | |
5 | 3D H(CCO)NH | 0.859 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 200 | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | |
6 | GFT (4,3)D HABCABcoNHN | 0.859 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 200 | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | |
7 | SIMUTANEOUS 1H, 15N, 13C NOESY | 0.859 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 200 | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | |
8 | 3D CCHTOCSY | 0.859 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 200 | 6.5 | ambient | 298 |
NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
1 | Bruker | AVANCE | 800 |
2 | Varian | INOVA | 600 |
NMR Refinement | ||
---|---|---|
Method | Details | Software |
distance geometry, simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, torsion angle dynamics | CNS |
NMR Ensemble Information | |
---|---|
Conformer Selection Criteria | target function |
Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
Representative Model | 1 (lowest energy) |
Computation: NMR Software | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
1 | refinement | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
2 | structure solution | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
3 | geometry optimization | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
4 | refinement | CYANA | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich | |
5 | structure solution | CYANA | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich | |
6 | geometry optimization | CYANA | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich | |
7 | refinement | AutoStructure | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione | |
8 | data analysis | AutoStructure | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione | |
9 | geometry optimization | AutoStructure | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione | |
10 | chemical shift assignment | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
11 | data analysis | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
12 | peak picking | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
13 | collection | TopSpin | Bruker Biospin | |
14 | processing | NMRPipe | Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax | |
15 | collection | VnmrJ | Varian | |
16 | chemical shift assignment | AutoAssign | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |