Experiment: 2KG6

Solution Structure of the acetyl Actinorhodin Acyl Carrier Protein from Streptomyces coelicolor

SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment	Type	Sample Contents	Solvent	Ionic Strength	pH	Pressure	Temperature (K)	Spectrometer
1	2D 1H-15N HSQC	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298
2	3D CBCA(CO)NH	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298
3	3D HNCACB	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298
4	3D H(CCO)NH	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298
5	3D C(CO)NH	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298
6	3D HCCH-TOCSY	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298
7	3D HNCO	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298
8	3D HNHA	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298
9	3D 1H-15N NOESY	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298
10	3D 1H-13C NOESY	1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3	95% H2O/5% D2O		5.5	ambient	298

NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer	Manufacturer	Model	Field Strength
1	Varian	INOVA	600

NMR Refinement
Method	Details	Software
simulated annealing	ALL STRUCTURE CALCULATIONS WERE CARRIED OUT USING THE AMBIGUOUS RESTRAINTS FOR ITERATIVE ASSIGNMENT OF NOES (ARIA) PROTOCOL VERSION 1.2. THE 20 BEST STRUCTURES (SORTED ACCORDING TO TOTAL ENERGY) WERE SELECTED FOR WATER REFINEMENT. WATER REFINED STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SLIGHTLY MODIFIED REFINEMENT SCRIPT APPLIED TO THE RECOORD DATABASE. PROCHECK AND WHATCHECK AND QUALITY INDICATORS WERE COMPARED TO THE AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE RECOORD DATABASE OF PROTEIN NMR STRUCTURES.	ARIA

NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria	structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number	100
Conformers Submitted Total Number	20
Representative Model	1 (closest to the average)

Computation: NMR Software
#	Classification	Version	Software Name	Author
1	structure solution	ARIA	1.2	Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
2	refinement	ARIA	1.2	Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
3	peak picking	ARIA	1.2	Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
4	chemical shift assignment	ANALYSIS	1.0	Tim Stevens, Wayne Boucher (CCPN)
5	data analysis	ANALYSIS	1.0	Tim Stevens, Wayne Boucher (CCPN)
6	peak picking	ANALYSIS	1.0	Tim Stevens, Wayne Boucher (CCPN)
7	processing	NMRPipe		Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax