☰ Navigation Tabs
Solution Structure of the C-Terminal 14 kDa Domain of the tau subunit from Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase III
NMR Experiment Experiment Type Sample Contents Solvent Ionic Strength pH Pressure Temperature (K) Spectrometer 1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1.8 mM tau14 15N,13C; 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303 2 HNCACB 1.8 mM tau14 15N,13C; 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303 3 CACB(CO)NH 1.8 mM tau14 15N,13C; 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303 4 HNCO 1.8 mM tau14 15N,13C; 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303 5 HNCA 1.8 mM tau14 15N,13C; 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303 6 HN(CO)CA 1.8 mM tau14 15N,13C; 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303 7 HNHA 1.8 mM tau14 15N,13C; 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303 8 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1.8 mM tau14 15N,13C; 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303 9 13C-HSQC 0.6 mM tau14 10% 13C; 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303 10 2D NOESY 1.8 mM tau14, 5 mM phosphate buffer with 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.8; 90% H2O, 10% D2O 90% H2O/10% D2O 100 mM NaCl 6.8 1 atm 303
NMR Spectrometer Information Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength 1 Varian INOVA 600 2 Bruker AVANCE 800
NMR Refinement Method Details Software torsion angle dynamics The structures are based on a total of 1891 NOE-derived
distance constraints and 241 dihedral angle restraints. TopSpin
NMR Ensemble Information Conformer Selection Criteria The submitted conformer models are the 20 structures with the lowest energy violations Conformers Calculated Total Number 200 Conformers Submitted Total Number 20 Representative Model 1 (the structure closest to the average)
Additional NMR Experimental Information Details The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy
Computation: NMR Software # Classification Version Software Name Author 1 processing TopSpin 1.3 Bruker 2 structure solution DYANA 1.5 Guentert 3 processing PROSA 6.1 Guentert 4 refinement OPAL 2.6 Luginbuehl 5 data analysis CARA 1.2 Damberger