8T6C

Crystal structure of T33-18.2: Deep-learning sequence design of co-assembling tetrahedron protein nanoparticles


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.92 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.242 
  • R-Value Work: 0.198 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.200 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.0 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Rapid and automated design of two-component protein nanomaterials using ProteinMPNN.

de Haas, R.J.Brunette, N.Goodson, A.Dauparas, J.Yi, S.Y.Yang, E.C.Dowling, Q.Nguyen, H.Kang, A.Bera, A.K.Sankaran, B.de Vries, R.Baker, D.King, N.P.

(2024) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 121: e2314646121-e2314646121

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314646121
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    8T6C, 8T6E, 8T6N

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The design of protein-protein interfaces using physics-based design methods such as Rosetta requires substantial computational resources and manual refinement by expert structural biologists. Deep learning methods promise to simplify protein-protein interface design and enable its application to a wide variety of problems by researchers from various scientific disciplines. Here, we test the ability of a deep learning method for protein sequence design, ProteinMPNN, to design two-component tetrahedral protein nanomaterials and benchmark its performance against Rosetta. ProteinMPNN had a similar success rate to Rosetta, yielding 13 new experimentally confirmed assemblies, but required orders of magnitude less computation and no manual refinement. The interfaces designed by ProteinMPNN were substantially more polar than those designed by Rosetta, which facilitated in vitro assembly of the designed nanomaterials from independently purified components. Crystal structures of several of the assemblies confirmed the accuracy of the design method at high resolution. Our results showcase the potential of deep learning-based methods to unlock the widespread application of designed protein-protein interfaces and self-assembling protein nanomaterials in biotechnology.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Physical Chemistry and Soft Matter, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6078 WE, The Netherlands.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
T33-18.2 : B
A, B, C, D
119synthetic constructMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
T33-18.2 : A
E, F, G, H
110synthetic constructMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.92 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.242 
  • R-Value Work: 0.198 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.200 
  • Space Group: H 3
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 138.812α = 90
b = 138.812β = 90
c = 129.106γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
PHENIXrefinement
DIALSdata reduction
SCALAdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationUnited States--

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2024-04-24
    Type: Initial release