SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC1 mM [U-99% 15N] BcII-1, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-2, 20 mM MES-3, 100 mM sodium chloride-490% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
22D 1H-15N HSQC1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
32D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
42D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
53D CBCA(CO)NH1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
63D HNCACB1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
73D HNCA1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
83D HN(CA)CO1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
93D HNCO1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
103D HCCH-TOCSY1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
113D HCCH-TOCSY1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
123D 1H-15N NOESY1 mM [U-99% 15N] BcII-1, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-2, 20 mM MES-3, 100 mM sodium chloride-490% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
133D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
143D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] BcII-5, 1 mM R-Thiomandelic Acid-6, 20 mM MES-7, 100 mM sodium chloride-890% H2O/10% D2O1206.4ambient308
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE800
2BrukerAVANCE600
3BrukerAVANCE600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealing, torsion angle dynamicsThe refinement protocol used consisted of five cycles of simulated annealing with a high start temperature (8000 K) and a gradual slow cooling to a low temperature (100 K) in a large number of steps (20,000). This standard torsion angle based simulating annealing protocol with all constraints applied simultaneously is combined with cycles of redundant dihedral angle constraints (REDAC; Guntert and Wuthrich, 1991). Several cycles of this combined refinement protocol, which eliminates violations and progressively reduces target function values while improving local and overall quality, were used to generate the final converged structures. Out of an ensemble of 100 converged structures generated, the 20 best (lowest CYANA target function during refinement) structures were selected.CYANA
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1structure solutionCYANAGuntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
2refinementCYANAGuntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
3structure solutionCANDIDGuntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
4automated noe assignmentCANDIDGuntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5data analysisSparkyGoddard
6peak pickingSparkyGoddard
7data analysisMOLMOLKoradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
8processingNMRPipeDelaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
9collectionTopSpinBruker Biospin
10collectionXwinNMRBruker Biospin
11validationProcheckNMRLaskowski and MacArthur
12validationWHAT IFVriend
13processingNMRDrawDelaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax