5BRV

Catalytic Improvement of an Artificial Metalloenzyme by Computational Design


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.60 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.230 
  • R-Value Work: 0.185 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.187 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Improving the Catalytic Performance of an Artificial Metalloenzyme by Computational Design.

Heinisch, T.Pellizzoni, M.Durrenberger, M.Tinberg, C.E.Kohler, V.Klehr, J.Haussinger, D.Baker, D.Ward, T.R.

(2015) J Am Chem Soc 137: 10414-10419

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b06622
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    5BRU, 5BRV, 5BRW

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Artifical metalloenzymes combine the reactivity of small molecule catalysts with the selectivity of enzymes, and new methods are required to tune the catalytic properties of these systems for an application of interest. Structure-based computational design could help to identify amino acid mutations leading to improved catalytic activity and enantioselectivity. Here we describe the application of Rosetta Design for the genetic optimization of an artificial transfer hydrogenase (ATHase hereafter), [(η(5)-Cp*)Ir(pico)Cl] ⊂ WT hCA II (Cp* = Me5C5(-)), for the asymmetric reduction of a cyclic imine, the precursor of salsolsidine. Based on a crystal structure of the ATHase, computational design afforded four hCAII variants with protein backbone-stabilizing and hydrophobic cofactor-embedding mutations. In dansylamide-competition assays, these designs showed 46-64-fold improved affinity for the iridium pianostool complex [(η(5)-Cp*)Ir(pico)Cl]. Gratifyingly, the new designs yielded a significant improvement in both activity and enantioselectivity (from 70% ee (WT hCA II) to up to 92% ee and a 4-fold increase in total turnover number) for the production of (S)-salsolidine. Introducing additional hydrophobicity in the Cp*-moiety of the Ir-catalyst provided by adding a propyl substituent on the Cp* moiety yields the most (S)-selective (96% ee) ATHase reported to date. X-ray structural data indicate that the high enantioselectivity results from embedding the piano stool moiety within the protein, consistent with the computational model.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    †Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Carbonic anhydrase 2260Homo sapiensMutation(s): 4 
Gene Names: CA2
EC: 4.2.1.1 (PDB Primary Data), 4.2.1.69 (UniProt)
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for P00918 (Homo sapiens)
Explore P00918 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00918
PHAROS:  P00918
GTEx:  ENSG00000104267 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00918
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 2 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
9TH
Query on 9TH

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
C [auth A]pentamethylcyclopentadienyl iridium [N-benzensulfonamide-(2-pyridylmethyl-4-benzensulfonamide)amin] chloride
C28 H31 Cl Ir N3 O4 S2
XWFVBMXQNDOMCI-UHFFFAOYSA-M
ZN
Query on ZN

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
B [auth A]ZINC ION
Zn
PTFCDOFLOPIGGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.60 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.230 
  • R-Value Work: 0.185 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.187 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 42.23α = 90
b = 41.544β = 104.11
c = 72.13γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
Aimlessdata scaling
PHASERphasing
XDSdata reduction

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2015-06-24
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2015-08-12
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2015-08-26
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2024-01-10
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Refinement description