3TGJ

S195A TRYPSINOGEN COMPLEXED WITH BOVINE PANCREATIC TRYPSIN INHIBITOR (BPTI)


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.240 
  • R-Value Work: 0.197 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.197 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Comparison of Anionic and Cationic Trypsinogens: The Anionic Activation Domain is More Flexible in Solution and Differs in its Mode of Bpti Binding in the Crystal Structure

Pasternak, A.Ringe, D.Hedstrom, L.

(1999) Protein Sci 8: 253-258

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.8.1.253
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    3TGI, 3TGJ

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Unlike bovine cationic trypsin, rat anionic trypsin retains activity at high pH. This alkaline stability has been attributed to stabilization of the salt bridge between the N-terminal Ile16 and Asp194 by the surface negative charge (Soman K, Yang A-S, Honig B, Fletterick R., 1989, Biochemistry 28:9918-9926). The formation of this salt bridge controls the conformation of the activation domain in trypsin. In this work we probe the structure of rat trypsinogen to determine the effects of the surface negative charge on the activation domain in the absence of the Ile16-Asp194 salt bridge. We determined the crystal structures of the rat trypsin-BPTI complex and the rat trypsinogen-BPTI complex at 1.8 and 2.2 A, respectively. The BPTI complex of rat trypsinogen resembles that of rat trypsin. Surprisingly, the side chain of Ile16 is found in a similar position in both the rat trypsin and trypsinogen complexes, although it is not the N-terminal residue and cannot form the salt bridge in trypsinogen. The resulting position of the activation peptide alters the conformation of the adjacent autolysis loop (residues 142-153). While bovine trypsinogen and trypsin have similar CD spectra, the CD spectrum of rat trypsinogen has only 60% of the intensity of rat trypsin. This lower intensity most likely results from increased flexibility around two conserved tryptophans, which are adjacent to the activation domain. The NMR spectrum of rat trypsinogen contains high field methyl signals as observed in bovine trypsinogen. It is concluded that the activation domain of rat trypsinogen is more flexible than that of bovine trypsinogen, but does not extend further into the protein core.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Chemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
TRYPSINA [auth E]233Rattus norvegicusMutation(s): 1 
EC: 3.4.21.4
UniProt
Find proteins for P00763 (Rattus norvegicus)
Explore P00763 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00763
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00763
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
BOVINE PANCREATIC TRYPSIN INHIBITORB [auth I]65Bos taurusMutation(s): 0 
UniProt
Find proteins for P00974 (Bos taurus)
Explore P00974 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00974
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00974
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.240 
  • R-Value Work: 0.197 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.197 
  • Space Group: P 32 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 92.66α = 90
b = 92.66β = 90
c = 62.36γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
X-PLORmodel building
X-PLORrefinement
X-PLORphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 1998-12-23
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-03-25
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2021-11-03
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.4: 2024-11-20
    Changes: Data collection, Structure summary