3MCK | pdb_00003mck

Crystal structure of anti-beta-amyloid antibody C705


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.30 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.254 (Depositor), 0.214 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.203 (Depositor) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.204 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 3MCK

This is version 1.5 of the entry. See complete history

Literature

Antibody modeling assessment.

Almagro, J.C.Beavers, M.P.Hernandez-Guzman, F.Maier, J.Shaulsky, J.Butenhof, K.Labute, P.Thorsteinson, N.Kelly, K.Teplyakov, A.Luo, J.Sweet, R.Gilliland, G.L.

(2011) Proteins 79: 3050-3066

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.23130
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    3MCK

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    A blinded study to assess the state of the art in three-dimensional structure modeling of the variable region (Fv) of antibodies was conducted. Nine unpublished high-resolution x-ray Fab crystal structures covering a wide range of antigen-binding site conformations were used as benchmark to compare Fv models generated by four structure prediction methodologies. The methodologies included two homology modeling strategies independently developed by CCG (Chemical Computer Group) and Accerlys Inc, and two fully automated antibody modeling servers: PIGS (Prediction of ImmunoGlobulin Structure), based on the canonical structure model, and Rosetta Antibody Modeling, based on homology modeling and Rosetta structure prediction methodology. The benchmark structure sequences were submitted to Accelrys and CCG and a set of models for each of the nine antibody structures were generated. PIGS and Rosetta models were obtained using the default parameters of the servers. In most cases, we found good agreement between the models and x-ray structures. The average rmsd (root mean square deviation) values calculated over the backbone atoms between the models and structures were fairly consistent, around 1.2 Å. Average rmsd values of the framework and hypervariable loops with canonical structures (L1, L2, L3, H1, and H2) were close to 1.0 Å. H3 prediction yielded rmsd values around 3.0 Å for most of the models. Quality assessment of the models and the relative strengths and weaknesses of the methods are discussed. We hope this initiative will serve as a model of scientific partnership and look forward to future antibody modeling assessments.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Centocor R&D, Inc, Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087, USA. jcalmagro@hotmail.com

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 96.98 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 7,024 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 890 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 894 
  • Unique protein chains: 2

Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
C705 MONOCLONAL LIGHT CHAINA [auth L],
C [auth A]
219Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
C705 MONOCLONAL HEAVY CHAINB [auth H],
D [auth B]
228Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.30 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.254 (Depositor), 0.214 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.203 (Depositor) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.204 (Depositor) 
Space Group: C 1 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 172.25α = 90
b = 78.25β = 95.45
c = 74.63γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
CrystalCleardata collection
MOLREPphasing
REFMACrefinement
d*TREKdata reduction
d*TREKdata scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2011-02-09
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-08-10
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2011-11-02
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.4: 2023-09-06
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description
  • Version 1.5: 2024-11-27
    Changes: Structure summary