3LWB | pdb_00003lwb

Crystal Structure of apo D-alanine:D-alanine Ligase (Ddl) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.10 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.221 (Depositor), 0.218 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.173 (Depositor), 0.170 (DCC) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 3LWB

This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history

Literature

Structure of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis D-Alanine:D-Alanine Ligase, a Target of the Antituberculosis Drug D-Cycloserine.

Bruning, J.B.Murillo, A.C.Chacon, O.Barletta, R.G.Sacchettini, J.C.

(2011) Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 291-301

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00558-10
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    3LWB

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    D-alanine:D-alanine ligase (EC 6.3.2.4; Ddl) catalyzes the ATP-driven ligation of two D-alanine (D-Ala) molecules to form the D-alanyl:D-alanine dipeptide. This molecule is a key building block in peptidoglycan biosynthesis, making Ddl an attractive target for drug development. D-Cycloserine (DCS), an analog of D-Ala and a prototype Ddl inhibitor, has shown promise for the treatment of tuberculosis. Here, we report the crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ddl at a resolution of 2.1 Å. This structure indicates that Ddl is a dimer and consists of three discrete domains; the ligand binding cavity is at the intersection of all three domains and conjoined by several loop regions. The M. tuberculosis apo Ddl structure shows a novel conformation that has not yet been observed in Ddl enzymes from other species. The nucleotide and D-alanine binding pockets are flexible, requiring significant structural rearrangement of the bordering regions for entry and binding of both ATP and D-Ala molecules. Solution affinity and kinetic studies showed that DCS interacts with Ddl in a manner similar to that observed for D-Ala. Each ligand binds to two binding sites that have significant differences in affinity, with the first binding site exhibiting high affinity. DCS inhibits the enzyme, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of 0.37 mM under standard assay conditions, implicating a preferential and weak inhibition at the second, lower-affinity binding site. Moreover, DCS binding is tighter at higher ATP concentrations. The crystal structure illustrates potential drugable sites that may result in the development of more-effective Ddl inhibitors.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2128, USA.

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 79.63 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 4,940 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 621 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 746 
  • Unique protein chains: 1

Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
D-alanine--D-alanine ligase
A, B
373Mycobacterium tuberculosisMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: ddlddlAMT3059MTCY349.06Rv2981c
EC: 6.3.2.4
UniProt
Find proteins for P9WP31 (Mycobacterium tuberculosis (strain ATCC 25618 / H37Rv))
Explore P9WP31 
Go to UniProtKB:  P9WP31
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP9WP31
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.10 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.221 (Depositor), 0.218 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.173 (Depositor), 0.170 (DCC) 
Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 51.72α = 90
b = 108.302β = 99.92
c = 69.064γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
PHASERphasing
PHENIXrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
HKL-2000data collection

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2010-03-09
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2017-11-08
    Changes: Refinement description
  • Version 1.3: 2023-09-06
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description