2XKL | pdb_00002xkl

Crystal Structure of Mouse Apolipoprotein M


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.50 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.247 (Depositor), 0.250 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.187 (Depositor), 0.188 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.190 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 2XKL

This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history

Literature

Mouse Apom Displays an Unprecedented Seven-Stranded Lipocalin Fold: Folding Decoy or Alternative Native Fold?

Sevvana, M.Kassler, K.Ahnstrom, J.Weiler, S.Dahlback, B.Sticht, H.Muller, Y.A.

(2010) J Mol Biology 404: 363

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.062
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    2XKL

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Mouse apolipoprotein M (m-apoM) displays a 79% sequence identity to human apolipoprotein M (h-apoM). Both proteins are apolipoproteins associated with high-density lipoproteins, with similar anticipated biological functions. The structure of h-apoM has recently been determined by X-ray crystallography, which revealed that h-apoM displays, as expected, a lipocalin-like fold characterized by an eight-stranded β‑barrel that encloses an internal fatty-acid-binding site. Surprisingly, this is not true for m-apoM. After refolding from inclusion bodies, the crystal structure of m-apoM (reported here at 2.5 Å resolution) displays a novel yet unprecedented seven-stranded β-barrel structure. The fold difference is not caused by a mere deletion of a single β-strand; instead, β-strands E and F are removed and replaced by a single β-strand A' formed from residues from the N-terminus. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that m-apoM is able to adopt both a seven-stranded barrel structure and an eight-stranded barrel structure in solution, and that both folds are comparably stable. Thermal unfolding simulations identify the position where β-strand exchange occurs as the weak point of the β-barrel. We wonder whether the switch in topology could have a biological function and could facilitate ligand release, since it goes hand in hand with a narrowing of the barrel diameter. Possibly also, the observed conformation represents an on-pathway or off-pathway folding intermediate of apoM. The difference in fold topology is quite remarkable, and the fold promiscuity observed for m-apoM might possibly provide a glimpse at potential cross-points during the evolution of β-barrels.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Lehrstuhl für Biotechnik, Department Biologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Im IZMP, Henkestr. 91, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany.

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 19.34 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 1,271 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 149 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 171 
  • Unique protein chains: 1

Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
APOLIPOPROTEIN M171Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for Q9Z1R3 (Mus musculus)
Explore Q9Z1R3 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q9Z1R3
IMPC:  MGI:1930124
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ9Z1R3
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.50 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.247 (Depositor), 0.250 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.187 (Depositor), 0.188 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.190 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 65 2 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 53.93α = 90
b = 53.93β = 90
c = 207.48γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
XDSdata reduction
XSCALEdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2010-10-13
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-05-08
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2023-12-20
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Other, Refinement description
  • Version 1.4: 2024-11-13
    Changes: Structure summary