1AO8

DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE COMPLEXED WITH METHOTREXATE, NMR, 21 STRUCTURES


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: SOLUTION NMR
  • Conformers Calculated: 21 
  • Conformers Submitted: 21 
  • Selection Criteria: NO NOE VIOLATION 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

The solution structure of the complex of Lactobacillus casei dihydrofolate reductase with methotrexate.

Gargaro, A.R.Soteriou, A.Frenkiel, T.A.Bauer, C.J.Birdsall, B.Polshakov, V.I.Barsukov, I.L.Roberts, G.C.Feeney, J.

(1998) J Mol Biol 277: 119-134

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1560
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1AO8

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    We have determined the three-dimensional solution structure of the complex of Lactobacillus casei dihydrofolate reductase (18.3 kDa, 162 amino acid residues) formed with the anticancer drug methotrexate using 2531 distance, 361 dihedral angle and 48 hydrogen bond restraints obtained from analysis of multidimensional NMR spectra. Simulated annealing calculations produced a family of 21 structures fully consistent with the constraints. The structure has four alpha-helices and eight beta-strands with two other regions, comprising residues 11 to 14 and 126 to 127, also interacting with each other in a beta-sheet manner. The methotrexate binding site is very well defined and the structure around its glutamate moiety was improved by including restraints reflecting the previously determined specific interactions between the glutamate alpha-carboxylate group with Arg57 and the gamma-carboxylate group with His28. The overall fold of the binary complex in solution is very similar to that observed in the X-ray studies of the ternary complex of L. casei dihydrofolate reductase formed with methotrexate and NADPH (the structures of the binary and ternary complexes have a root-mean-square difference over the backbone atoms of 0.97 A). Thus no major conformational change takes place when NADPH binds to the binary complex. In the binary complex, the loop comprising residues 9 to 23 which forms part of the active site has been shown to be in the "closed" conformation as defined by M. R. Sawaya & J. Kraut, who considered the corresponding loops in crystal structures of complexes of dihydrofolate reductases from several organisms. Thus the absence of the NADPH does not result in the "occluded" form of the loop as seen in crystal studies of some other dihydrofolate reductases in the absence of coenzyme. Some regions of the structure in the binary complex which form interaction sites for NADPH are less well defined than other regions. However, in general terms, the NADPH binding site appears to be essentially pre-formed in the binary complex. This may contribute to the tighter binding of coenzyme in the presence of methotrexate.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Division of Molecular Structure, National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE162Lacticaseibacillus caseiMutation(s): 0 
EC: 1.5.1.3
UniProt
Find proteins for P00381 (Lacticaseibacillus casei)
Explore P00381 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00381
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00381
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
MTX
Query on MTX

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
B [auth A]METHOTREXATE
C20 H22 N8 O5
FBOZXECLQNJBKD-ZDUSSCGKSA-N
Binding Affinity Annotations 
IDSourceBinding Affinity
MTX PDBBind:  1AO8 IC50: 6 (nM) from 1 assay(s)
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: SOLUTION NMR
  • Conformers Calculated: 21 
  • Conformers Submitted: 21 
  • Selection Criteria: NO NOE VIOLATION 

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 1998-02-25
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-03-24
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2022-02-16
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations, Other