1A7W

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE HISTONE HMFB FROM METHANOTHERMUS FERVIDUS


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.55 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.248 
  • R-Value Work: 0.198 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.200 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Crystal structures of recombinant histones HMfA and HMfB from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus.

Decanniere, K.Babu, A.M.Sandman, K.Reeve, J.N.Heinemann, U.

(2000) J Mol Biol 303: 35-47

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4104
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1A7W, 1B67, 1B6W, 1HTA

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus contains two small basic proteins, HMfA (68 amino acid residues) and HMfB (69 residues) that share a common ancestry with the eukaryal nucleosome core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. HMfA and HMfB have sequences that differ at 11 locations, they have different structural stabilities, and the complexes that they form with DNA have different electrophoretic mobilities. Here, crystal structures are documented for recombinant (r) HMfA at a resolution of 1.55 A refined to a crystallographic R-value of 19.8 % (tetragonal form) and at 1.48 A refined to a R-value of 18.8 % (orthorhombic form), and for rHMfB at 1.9 A refined to a R-value of 18.0 %. The rHMfA and rHMfB monomers have structures that are just histone folds in which a long central alpha-helix (alpha2; 29 residues) is separated from shorter N-terminal (alpha1; 11 residues) and C-terminal (alpha3; 10 residues) alpha-helices by two loops (L1 and L2; both 6 residues). Within L1 and L2, three adjacent residues are in extended (beta) conformation. rHMfA and rHMfB assemble into homodimers, with the alpha2 helices anti-parallel aligned and crossing at an angle of close to 35 degrees, and with hydrogen bonds formed between the extended, parallel regions of L1 and L2 resulting in short beta-ladders. Dimerization creates a novel N-terminal structure that contains four proline residues, two from each monomer. As prolines are present at these positions in all archaeal histone sequences, this proline-tetrad structure is likely to be a common feature of all archaeal histone dimers. Almost all residues that participate in monomer-monomer interactions are conserved in HMfA and HMfB, consistent with the ability of these monomers to form both homodimers and (HMfA+HMfB) heterodimers. Differences in side-chain interactions that result from non-conservative residue differences in HMfA and HMfB are identified, and the structure of a (rHMfA)(2)-DNA complex is presented based on the structures documented here and modeled by homology to histone-DNA interactions in the eukaryal nucleosome.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Forschungsgruppe Kristallographie, Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, Berlin, D-13125, Germany.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
HISTONE HMFB69Methanothermus fervidusMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: HMFB
UniProt
Find proteins for P19267 (Methanothermus fervidus)
Explore P19267 
Go to UniProtKB:  P19267
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP19267
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.55 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.248 
  • R-Value Work: 0.198 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.200 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 31.3α = 90
b = 61.58β = 90
c = 39.65γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
AMoREphasing
REFMACrefinement
DENZOdata reduction
CCP4data scaling
SCALAdata scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 1999-03-23
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-03-24
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Derived calculations, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2024-02-07
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.4: 2024-04-03
    Changes: Refinement description