250 uM A-8D, C-5,6-D2, G-D, U-5,6-D2 RNA (103-MER)
100% D2O
3 mM
7.5
1 atm
308
Bruker AVANCE 800
5
2D 1H-1H NOESY
250 uM A-8D, C-D, G-8D, U-D RNA (103-MER)
100% D2O
3 mM
7.5
1 atm
308
Bruker AVANCE 800
6
2D 1H-1H NOESY
250 uM A-H, C-D, G-H, U-D RNA (103-MER)
100% D2O
3 mM
7.5
1 atm
308
Bruker AVANCE 800
7
2D 1H-1H NOESY
250 uM A-H, C-H, G-D, U-D RNA (103-MER)
100% D2O
3 mM
7.5
1 atm
308
Bruker AVANCE 800
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer
Manufacturer
Model
Field Strength
1
Bruker
AVANCE
800
NMR Refinement
Method
Details
Software
molecular dynamics
Structure minimization
Amber
distance geometry
The SAXS scattering profiles for each structure were back calculated and the structures with lowest chi2 compared with experimental SAXS data were selected.
X-PLOR NIH
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria
target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number
1200
Conformers Submitted Total Number
10
Representative Model
1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#
Classification
Version
Software Name
Author
5
processing
NMRPipe
Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
6
processing
NMRDraw
Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
7
chemical shift assignment
NMRView
Johnson, One Moon Scientific
8
peak picking
NMRView
Johnson, One Moon Scientific
1
structure calculation
CYANA
Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
9
geometry optimization
CYANA
Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
4
refinement
Amber
Case, Darden, Cheatham III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, and Kollman