SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-1H NOESY1 mM AT26, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 120 mM potassium chloride90% H2O/10% D2O150 mM71 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 800
22D 1H-1H NOESY1 mM AT26, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 120 mM potassium chloride100% D2O150 mM71 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 800
32D 1H-1H TOCSY1 mM AT26, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 120 mM potassium chloride100% D2O150 mM71 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 800
42D 1H-1H COSY1 mM AT26, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 120 mM potassium chloride100% D2O150 mM71 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 800
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
2BrukerAVANCE III800
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
DGSA-distance geometry simulated annealingX-PLOR NIH
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number10
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1collectionTopSpinBruker Biospin
2peak pickingSparkyGoddard
3chemical shift assignmentSparkyGoddard
4data analysisSparkyGoddard
5structure calculationX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
6refinementX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore