☰ Navigation Tabs
Solution NMR structure of protein encoded by MTH693 from Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum: Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium target tt824a
NMR Experiment Experiment Type Sample Contents Solvent Ionic Strength pH Pressure Temperature (K) Spectrometer 1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 0.7 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.3 7.0 ambient 298 2 2D 1H-13C HSQC 0.7 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.3 7.0 ambient 298 3 4,3D, GFT HNNCABCA 0.7 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.3 7.0 ambient 298 4 4,3D, GFT CABCACONNH 0.7 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.3 7.0 ambient 298 5 4,3D, GFT HCCH COSY 0.7 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.3 7.0 ambient 298 6 3D, 15N-13C RESOLVEDSIMULTANIOUS NOESY 0.7 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.3 7.0 ambient 298 7 4,3D, GFT HAHB(CABCA)CONNH 0.7 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.3 7.0 ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength 1 Varian INOVA 750 2 Varian INOVA 600
NMR Refinement Method Details Software simulated annealing AutoAssign
NMR Ensemble Information Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy Conformers Calculated Total Number 100 Conformers Submitted Total Number 20 Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software # Classification Version Software Name Author 1 chemical shift assignment AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione 2 structure solution AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione 3 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read 4 refinement CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich 5 peak picking XEASY Bartels et al. 6 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax 7 data analysis TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax