1G7E

NMR STRUCTURE OF N-DOMAIN OF ERP29 PROTEIN


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
1HNCA, HNCO, HN(CO)CA0.3mM N-domain ERp29 U-15N,13C90% H2O/10% D2O.14.7ambient308
23D_15N-separated_NOESY0.3mM N-domain ERp29 U-15N,13C90% H2O/10% D2O.14.7ambient308
33D_13C-separated_NOESY0.3mM N-domain ERp29 U-15N,13C90% H2O/10% D2O.14.7ambient308
42D NOESY, 2D TOCSY, 2D DQF COSY0.3mM N-domain ERp2990% H2O/10% D2O.14.7ambient308
51H-15N HSQC, 1H-13C HSQC0.3mM N-domain ERp29 U-15N,13C90% H2O/10% D2O.14.7ambient308
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerDMX600
2VarianUNITYPLUS800
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
torsion angle dynamics, simulated annealingThe input for the final structure calculation of N-domain protein consisted of 1279 upper limit distance restraints and 358 dihedral angle restraints. 185 of the dihedral angle restraints reflected coupling constant information, while 173 of them had been derived by HABAS from NOE and steric restraints alone.XwinNMR
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy,target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number50
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model17 (lowest energy. model #1 was best after dyana calculations, model #17 was best after opal refinement)
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsThe signal assignment was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy. The structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques.
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1collectionXwinNMR2.5Bruker
2processingPROSA3.6Guentert
3data analysisXEASY970326Bartels
4structure solutionDYANA1.5Guentert
5refinementOPAL2.6Luginbul
6data analysisMOLMOL2.6.0Koradi