2B2X

VLA1 RdeltaH I-domain complexed with a quadruple mutant of the AQC2 Fab


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.272 
  • R-Value Work: 0.238 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.241 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.6 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Affinity enhancement of an in vivo matured therapeutic antibody using structure-based computational design

Clark, L.A.Boriack-Sjodin, P.A.Eldredge, J.Fitch, C.Friedman, B.Hanf, K.J.Jarpe, M.Liparoto, S.F.Li, Y.Lugovskoy, A.Miller, S.Rushe, M.Sherman, W.Simon, K.Van Vlijmen, H.

(2006) Protein Sci 15: 949-960

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.052030506
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    2B2X

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Improving the affinity of a high-affinity protein-protein interaction is a challenging problem that has practical applications in the development of therapeutic biomolecules. We used a combination of structure-based computational methods to optimize the binding affinity of an antibody fragment to the I-domain of the integrin VLA1. Despite the already high affinity of the antibody (Kd approximately 7 nM) and the moderate resolution (2.8 A) of the starting crystal structure, the affinity was increased by an order of magnitude primarily through a decrease in the dissociation rate. We determined the crystal structure of a high-affinity quadruple mutant complex at 2.2 A. The structure shows that the design makes the predicted contacts. Structural evidence and mutagenesis experiments that probe a hydrogen bond network illustrate the importance of satisfying hydrogen bonding requirements while seeking higher-affinity mutations. The large and diverse set of interface mutations allowed refinement of the mutant binding affinity prediction protocol and improvement of the single-mutant success rate. Our results indicate that structure-based computational design can be successfully applied to further improve the binding of high-affinity antibodies.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Biogen Idec, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA. louie@alumni.northwestern.edu


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Integrin alpha-1A,
D [auth B]
223Rattus norvegicusMutation(s): 4 
Gene Names: Itga1
UniProt
Find proteins for P18614 (Rattus norvegicus)
Explore P18614 
Go to UniProtKB:  P18614
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP18614
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Antibody AQC2 FabB [auth H],
E [auth I]
226Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 3
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Antibody AQC2 FabC [auth L],
F [auth M]
213Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.272 
  • R-Value Work: 0.238 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.241 
  • Space Group: P 1 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 106.12α = 90
b = 43.68β = 104.1
c = 153.88γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
MOLREPphasing
CNSrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
HKL-2000data reduction
CNXrefinement

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2006-04-18
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-05-01
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2011-11-16
    Changes: Atomic model
  • Version 1.4: 2017-10-11
    Changes: Refinement description
  • Version 1.5: 2021-10-20
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.6: 2023-08-23
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description